<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>EternalCraft  &#187;  Topic: Less strict rule?</title>
		<atom:link href="https://www.eternalcraft.com/forums/topic/less-strict-rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>https://www.eternalcraft.com/forums/topic/less-strict-rule/feed/</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 00:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.5.8-5815</generator>
		<language>en-US</language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>https://www.eternalcraft.com/forums/topic/less-strict-rule/#post-16522</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Less strict rule?]]></title>
					<link>https://www.eternalcraft.com/forums/topic/less-strict-rule/#post-16522</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Jerrika</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Okay, I know some people can chat spam without this but the rule, if you type a full sentence in caps you get a warning and the message &#8220;cool down or your gonna get kicked&#8221; or something. Why is this so strict? Could we make it so there has to be three posts before this message says cool down or have an plugin for an automatic mute system if they continue to Spam the chat after they&#8217;ve been kicked, and if they&#8217;ve spammed three more times after their mute they could be banned?</p>
<p>Seems fair, but it is strict because somebody may be excited and type in caps.</p>
<p>-Jerrika</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>https://www.eternalcraft.com/forums/topic/less-strict-rule/#post-16526</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Less strict rule?]]></title>
					<link>https://www.eternalcraft.com/forums/topic/less-strict-rule/#post-16526</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Zupers</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>The reason we have a strict limit on caps, is because it irritates other players. Spamguard is put in action to stop people from repeating the same messages or writing in caps constantly.</p>
<p>Spamguard provides a great service to players, by protecting the chat channels on the server.</p>
<p>Players should abide by server communication rules. Again, these rules are put in place to help members have a better experience on the server.</p>
<p>-Zupers</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>https://www.eternalcraft.com/forums/topic/less-strict-rule/#post-16531</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Less strict rule?]]></title>
					<link>https://www.eternalcraft.com/forums/topic/less-strict-rule/#post-16531</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Jerrika</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I do acknowledge what you are saying Zupers, but could they be allowed to message somebody in caps atleast, but not say it?</p>
<p>And then that person who has been messaged could have the option of doing a command called /ignore, ignoring them for 60 minutes. This includes there messages and what they say in the normal chat.</p>
<p>-Jerrika</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>https://www.eternalcraft.com/forums/topic/less-strict-rule/#post-16533</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Less strict rule?]]></title>
					<link>https://www.eternalcraft.com/forums/topic/less-strict-rule/#post-16533</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Zupers</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>If players are found using excessive caps, in any of our servers, they will be warned and if they continue, muted. It would be wise to just stick with normal text and not typing everything in caps, because its unnecessary.</p>
<p>-Zupers</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>https://www.eternalcraft.com/forums/topic/less-strict-rule/#post-16535</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Less strict rule?]]></title>
					<link>https://www.eternalcraft.com/forums/topic/less-strict-rule/#post-16535</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Jerrika</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks Zupers. If a mod could close this thread to replies because that answered by suggestion.</p>
<p>-Jerrika</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>https://www.eternalcraft.com/forums/topic/less-strict-rule/#post-16537</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Less strict rule?]]></title>
					<link>https://www.eternalcraft.com/forums/topic/less-strict-rule/#post-16537</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Zupers</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Closed.</p>
<p>-Zupers</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>

